How Covert Recording Exposed a Multi-Million Pound Holiday Ownership Scheme

Prosecutors have labeled it as among the biggest deceptions of its nature in the UK.

A total of 14 defendants have been sentenced for their part in a multi-million pound plot to swindle more than 3,500 timeshare holders.

The affected individuals were keen to exit long-standing timeshare contracts and tried to find support.

Most were from 60 and 80. In excess of 500 of them surrendered more than £10,000, and one individual handed over in excess of £80,000.

Those victimized were faced high-pressure sales meetings continuing for six hours. They were out of money, owning useless fake "rewards" and still trapped in high-priced timeshare contracts they could no longer use.

The Company Behind the Fraud

The business at the centre of the scam was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They collected clients' cash to support the owners' opulent lifestyle of private schools, high-end properties and exclusive air travel.

The leader at the helm of the firm, the company director, was given a 90-month jail time in January for conspiracy to defraud.

Recently, his wife one of the co-defendants was among the last group to hear their sentences.

She received a two-year suspended prison term at Southwark Crown Court after confessing to financial crime.

It has been a lengthy process and represents a major victory for the people who spoke out, the law enforcement and the Crown.

How the Inquiry Started

The initial awareness of the firm came in the mid-2016. The role involved in the research department of a broadcasting service, creating documentary shows.

A colleague mentioned that his mother had assumed the rights of a holiday property in a European resort and, after long-term use, had begun looking to terminate the contract.

It's worth mentioning how popular holiday ownership had grown with UK travelers in the 1980s and 1990s.

Holiday ownership allowed people to access the same accommodation each season, or swap their time slots with fellow investors who had properties in other resorts. Approximately 600,000 sun-lovers accepted that option.

The early surge was linked to a lot of reports about rip-off merchants deceptively promoting investments. They became a staple on consumer TV programmes.

The typical vacation property deal locked buyers for long periods.

At that time, those holders who had used their regular accommodation in the sun for decades were advancing in years, and many were attempting to wave goodbye to their timeshares.

A number had declining mobility and were unable to visit their properties. A few just felt they'd achieved their goals from them. And others had died, in many cases leaving their heirs to inherit the deals - along with their regular contributions and maintenance fees.

The Covert Probe Develops

This was the situation the friend's mum had been placed. She looked online for answers and found the company, a firm whose website claimed to release her from her agreement.

However, having submitted funds and arranged an appointment with them, her family smelled a rat.

Subsequent checking revealed many victims reporting they had handed over cash and got nothing in return. Actually, they had been left out of pocket. A lot of it.

The investigative unit started looking into what was occurring. It was rapidly apparent that there were dubious individuals operating in the vacation property industry.

One lawyer had hundreds of individual complaints preparing to take action against SMT.

The team interviewed clients who had used the firm and they collectively described identical situations. They believed the firm would buy their property from them but when they went to a consultation (for which they made an advance payment) they were informed there was no market for their property.

Rather, they were encouraged - indeed compelled - to commit further cash investing in "Monster Rewards", linked to the organization's holding firm, Monster Travel.

The nature of these rewards was somewhat vague. They seemed similar to a kind of currency, offering reduced-price holidays and services and retail offers.

And they were seemingly "transferable with additional holders, at a future date.

Investing money immediately would produce an future return that would pay for the company's charges and allow the timeshare holder in profit, freed at last from their pesky contract.

An unrealistic promise? Indeed, it was.

A 'Misleading Tactic'

Assuming these reports were correct, this was a major deception.

This is known as a "bait-and-switch."

An operator - here the company - "attracts the customer by marketing a specific service but then to say that's not available, directing the customer towards a different, lower-quality product or service.

Such practices are unlawful. Equipped with all the accounts we had assembled, we made the case to covertly record one of the company's meetings.

The process requires commitment, energy, and strong justifications for why this is the only way to collect the information necessary to prove wrongdoing.

Armed with that permission, our compact group arranged a appointment with one of the firm's agents in the location.

Posing as a member of the public aiming to help his mother out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement

Joseph Bennett
Joseph Bennett

Environmental scientist and sustainable living advocate with over a decade of experience in renewable energy projects.